Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Thursday, 8th January 2009 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Put this foolish tourist tax to bed



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 06 June 2008
SOME Liberal and SNP councillors are wakening up to the idea of having a tourism tax – or a bed tax, as it should be more properly known – as a way to fund Edinburgh's local promotions.
I doubt that putting an extra £6 on the Balmoral's rack rate of £305 a night is going to deter anyone, but we would be foolish to pretend that this is what the bed tax would mean.

Firstly, the Balmoral is not typical of the hotel market in Edinbur
gh; it's an exclusive hotel with the costs of staying there often met by corporate expenses or by people of high personal wealth. Justifying a bed tax because those that sleep at the Balmoral can afford it is rather like justifying a rise in car tax because the owners of Rolls-Royces or Bentleys won't mind.

Instead, we should be looking at what it will do to the budget market, or economy class – the hotel equivalent of owners of the Ford Mondeo or Nissan Micra. This part of the market is price-sensitive so we could expect Edinburgh to be the loser. 'Come to Edinburgh, but stay in Glasgow' might as well be the new slogan!

Then there is the naivety to believe that the tax will stay at the two per cent a room per night being touted. Of course it won't. It will go up. And up. And up. Within a couple of years the tax could easily reach five per cent or more, easily adding £30 to an average bill over a week.

The reason consideration is being given to the bed tax idea is simple – Edinburgh council has a financial crisis and it wants to find new ways of paying for its operations rather than taking the harder decision to review what it actually does and if it could be doing some things more efficiently.

It is true that some other countries use a bed tax to raise revenues – but various North American states or provinces don't have VAT or business rates.

Of course if the money that was raised in business taxes in Edinburgh actually reached the council there wouldn't be a problem at all – but it doesn't. While I personally believe our politicians should be phasing out Scotland's business rates – so that our economy enjoys a greater competitive edge against the rest of the UK – it is nothing short of criminal that the business rates collected in Edinburgh don't stay in Edinburgh.

Business rates are not a local tax – they are a national tax set annually in the Scottish Parliament. They may be collected locally but the money is held centrally and disbursed by the Scottish Government as it sees fit. The result (and the SNP has behaved no differently to Labour and the Liberal Democrats) is that Edinburgh businesses pay over £80 million more in business rates than the city gets back.

There really is no need for a bed tax, there are enough taxes out there already – all we need to do is make sure that Edinburgh benefits from the taxes it raises.

Statuesque
SO a memorial to Dr Elsie Inglis, suffragette and most famously saviour of thousands of allied soldiers during the Great War through her Scottish Women's Hospitals for Foreign Service, is to be unveiled in France. What a pity more isn't being done in Edinburgh to celebrate the life and sacrifice of this most courageous of women.

Soon a statue of economist and philosopher Adam Smith will be unveiled in the Royal Mile – paid for, fittingly, by private subscription. What a shame that plans to erect a statue to Elsie Inglis appear so far to have come to nought.

There are too few statues of women and a tribute to Elsie would begin to redress that imbalance.

A memorial in Abbaye de Royaumont – where her hospital was – makes sense, but a statue of her and her nurses in the Royal Mile – which could perhaps be funded by the Royal College of Surgeons, the Royal College of Nursing, the BMA and Unison – is long overdue.

Cold reception
I LIKE Iceland – it has an alluring natural landscape and the hot pools and short nights make it a must-see kind of place. Unless you are a polar bear, that is.

Some poor bear managed to arrive just the other day on an ice flow but was shot dead rather than tranquillised. The last polar bear sighted in Iceland was 16 years ago – it too was killed.

The negative media coverage that will now be reverberating around the world reporting the needless death of this endangered species will do the country no favours. I recommend the Tourism Minister buys a supply of tranquilliser guns and gives them to the police.

Scots fans off to the World Cup qualifying match later this year should take care not to wear any polar bear outfits – or they might not see Scotland again.





The full article contains 827 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 06 June 2008 8:36 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Brian Monteith
 
1

subrosa,

06/06/2008 10:08:36
Why aren't we permitted to post on the article about Alex Salmond taking an official car to an official event?

Maybe it's because it happens in London all the time, plus of course, Mr Brown has his henchmen in a following car.

Our First Minister deserves some security and if it means he travels half a mile in a car, then so be it. Really Scotsman you're constantly scraping the bottom of the barrel.
2

Jock 1O7,

06/06/2008 11:34:08
I agree the story about short car trips scrapes the bottom of the barrel.

I'm not sure about the security you mention for trips of 300-400yds. I can't imagine the threat being any more than an egg from a disgruntled ned. Is he scared or lazy?

3

Alasdair,

06/06/2008 11:50:36
Another badly written and poorly researched piece of effluent in this rag.
Brian Monteith - if you hate the idea of the tourist tax so much, why not mention that it was first mooted by the previous Labour admin?

Oh, that'll be because the anti-SNP agenga at Hootsmon towers forbids journalists from any unnecessary paining of Labour in a bad light!

As to the tax, this lamentable excuse for a paper is always the first to write congratulatory drivel about the amount the Fesival and New Year "bring into the Capital". The fact of the matter, however, is that the average Edinburgh resident, like my good self, sees none of this bonanza, and indeed is usually put out by the overcrowding, street closures, etc., but it's OUR council tax that goes towards many of the set-up and clean up costs!
A proposal to balance this indignity out should be welcomed with open arms.

Oh, and the only thing more predictable than the whining about the Nats was the panicky bemoaning of Glasgow. Listen, Brian, unlike your dwindling readership of Morningside grannies, many of us 'burghers DON'T share your weirdo inferiority complex regarding Glasgow. The rubbish peddled in the paper is beyond belief.
4

Langenburger,

06/06/2008 12:09:38
A bed tax is a good idea
It is a way of paying towards some of the benefits provided by the city and reduces the dependency on the hard pressed council tax payers
Even at something low like £2 or £3 per night it will add up to something that can make a difference
5

Brian S,

London/Edinburgh 06/06/2008 12:13:35
What planet are these folk at the Scotsman on?

Do they really expect the leader of our nation to walk everywhere - I wish they would get a grip and stop making themselves look like fools.

Alex Salmond derserves a motorcade if anything!
6

democracy,

Scottish Borders 06/06/2008 12:31:57
We just use other articles to make a point of not being able to remark on other articles.
I mean, it's blatantly obvious when HAMISH MACDONELL
writes his biased Unionist remarks on the SNP Government and allows no response, in the so called SCOTSMAN (ha,ha,ha.)All this amounts to is, ONE persons opinion among MILLIONS!!
7

Beergut,

Embra 06/06/2008 12:40:29
This paper seems to be running a campaign against the "tourist tax". As a previous writer has said what benefit do the residents of Edinburgh get from tourism? Apart from making their city difficult to navigate to and fro to their workplaces and, in August, a virtually impossible journey. We cannot buy tickets for the prestigious festival events - these are all sewn up by subscription & corporate organisations for sale to tourists. The tattoo was sold out months ago so heaven help any local who wants to go. The Royal Mile turns into a circus requiring traffic management and cleaning - for whose benefit? I certainly know who pays for it. And who gets the benefit? Big hotel chains, chain stores and all those embarrassing tartan shops who bring our culture into ridicule.
8

Saltire Sarah,

Leicester 06/06/2008 13:13:40
What about all the people who hail from Edinburgh - still have family there and would like to visit at least a couple of times a year?

We're not rich wealthy tourists but we do need to stay in hotels. With the rise in the cost of travel and living how are normal people supposed to have a holiday and see their families?

We have now entered an era of the tax on fun and happiness.
9

NorT,

Edinburgh 06/06/2008 13:41:06
I agree with you #4 and #6
10

The Judge,

06/06/2008 15:36:13
#8 So we're expected to believe you won't come to Edinburgh for the sake of a couple of quid a night in the form of a bed tax?

A couple of quid a night? Honestly you wouldn't come to Edinburgh for the price of 10 cigarettes? I'm sorry but I don't believe you.

NO tourist or visitor would cancel their holiday for a couple of quid a night, the so called bed tax should have been introduced a decade ago.

11

overshot,

perth 06/06/2008 15:52:24
What about the poor dossers, will they get taxed in the hostels? There are far more important issues going on and more worthy of comment. Please give us the news.
12

Why can't I use my usual name?,

Glasgow 06/06/2008 17:43:22
A modest bed tax is a good idea.
13

subrosa,

06/06/2008 20:18:52
Someone said on another thread that it won't just be £1-£3. Very soon it will start to be £5 then £10. I can see it now. Then hoteliers will start creative accounting, then the Inland Revenue will cost Scotland more because they need to collect this, then staff will be sacked. It's all there if you use a bit of foresight.

Other countries use the tax in a ring-fenced manner with most feeding it back into the area where it was acquired. Don't know if the Inland Revenue and Treasury will allow that. After all, they don't recognise the present oil windfall as extra tax because 'it has to be viewed across the board' (Alistair Darling).


14

Kaytoc,

Maryland,USA 06/06/2008 21:15:25
I agree that this a poorly researched article. I am curious to know if the tourism numbers are down which would raise the fear that the tax would be a deterrent. Too lazy and shoddy to find out before spewing, Sir?

As for, "It is true that some other countries use a bed tax to raise revenues – but various North American states or provinces don't have VAT or business rates."
Various? There are seven states here that do not have a sales (VAT) tax. Each state sets it's own rate and the Lodging Tax is added to that. I've seen the Lodging Tax as low as 6% and as high as 19%.
I know the bookings are down this summer over here. It doesn't make sense to raise rates in this economic climate. I'm already seeing adverts with offers far lower than they were last year.
15

celtic4,

USA 07/06/2008 01:19:55
Look, I have said this before and you had BEST believe me, I will NOT go to Edinburgh and if there is a bed tax added on, that really clinches it. Too pricey. I will go to Stirling where things are less expensive and have just as nice a time. That makes two of us, as we are coming over together. The tourist has enough problems just going places right now, much less added money on. Get real!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.