Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Thursday, 20th November 2008 Change Date

Claim a Free Glayva Miniature

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

£125,000 scheme to rejuvenate notorious Old Town blackspot



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 24 July 2008
A NEW bid is to be launched to find a lasting "solution" which will enable historic city centre steps which have been plagued by vandals and rough sleepers to be restored to their former glory.
The city council and Edinburgh World Heritage plan to rejuvenate the Scotsman Steps, which link North Bridge and Market Street and run alongside the site of the old Evening News offices, for about £125,000.

An architect is due to visit the site so
on and recommend what work should take place. However, it will have stonework repaired, paint and cement removed, broken tiles repaired, new lighting, and new decorative gates installed. In November, Labour councillor Norma Hart lodged a motion calling for the city council to take action.

The eyesore is potentially one of the first things tourists see – and smell, due to people urinating there – when they leave Waverley Station.

Daniel Pereira, general manager of The Scotsman Hotel, on North Bridge, has demanded improvement measures. He said: "This news is a joy. It's been such a sore subject as it's not a great way to welcome your guests to Edinburgh when they are constantly in disrepair. It portrays the city in a really bad light."

The Scotsman steps were built around 1899 in a French style with an enclosed octagonal spiral stair, decorative wrought iron grilles and glazed tiles in the interior.

The city council has attempted to prevent misuse and vandalism over the years, but gates that were previously installed were vandalised and had to be removed.

Councillor Robert Aldridge, the city's environment leader said: "A successful solution is long overdue and we need to work closely with partners to achieve one."

David McDonald, project manager with Edinburgh World Heritage, added: "People avoid using the Scotsman Steps because of the perceived safety, lighting, and litter problems. If they were in better condition then more people would use them, which in turn would add a self-policing element."

Once an assessment has been carried out an action plan will be drawn up, which would include reinstatement of appropriate gates, opening hours, cleaning, maintenance, policing and control of antisocial behaviour.

Moira Tasker, director of the Cockburn Association, said: "The Steps have suffered from benign neglect. Litter, vandalism and poor lighting has contributed to their under-use. By tackling these, we look forward to seeing reinvigoration of this public space."





The full article contains 403 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 24 July 2008 10:58 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Way Out West,

24/07/2008 12:13:19
It still won't stop the neds from peeing in them though. The more money you spend, the more likely they are to get trashed.

How about installing a lift there instead?
2

Sarcasm,

24/07/2008 12:28:05
Absolutely, neds are much more respectful of lifts.
3

Buttress,

24/07/2008 12:47:00
EWH is quietly getting on improving parts of the city, so look forward to seeing the results of the latest project.

Shame it wasn't given the job of St Andrew Square - might have been simpler, more appropriate to its surroundings and cost a lot less.
4

I love to eat Sellotape,

24/07/2008 12:52:58
The next time I see someone peeing on the steps I'm going to tell them to stop.

It's likely to be my mother.
5

The Geniune Mario Antionette,

24/07/2008 12:58:56
Yup - It will almost certainly be her
6

Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia,

24/07/2008 13:08:48
A "blackspot" has to be "notorious". You're not allowed to refer to it as anything else.
7

Buttress,

24/07/2008 13:18:26
At least, unlike the report of this in the Scotsman, the Cockburn Assoc has not been referred to as a 'heritage watchdog'. Small mercy, but mercy nonetheless.

8

The Geniune Mario Antionette,

24/07/2008 13:21:33
so there you are Sellotape - according to #6, you should have reffered to your mother as a notorious blackspot
9

Buttress,

24/07/2008 13:40:41
You're not allowed to c o c k a leg at the Cockburn, either. At least not on that 'wee' staircase. Or anyhere else, unless you're Malcolm Fraser:

http://www.independentrepublicofthecanongate.blogspot.com/

'The toxic wing' of the heritage lobby, eh Malcy?

(This site software will allow Cockburn but not c * *k... so nee snook c * *kin' either on those stairs.)







10

jimbob2402,

edinburgh 24/07/2008 13:54:07
AKA as the pishy steps!
11

Buttress,

24/07/2008 13:55:55
I suspect, as the council is taking on the repair costs, it wouldn't do so if not its responsibility.

12

LUVMACITY,

EDINBURGH 24/07/2008 14:08:18
Good news but what about the steps leading from High school yards down to the coogate. They have been shut for a number of years due to the same problem. I thought Mario was on holiday to give us a wee rest.
13

Buttress,

24/07/2008 14:13:55
More Mario:

http://edinburghnews.scotsman.com/edinburgh/Overseas-tourists-outnumber-Britons-for.4320383.jp
14

Prin the Dissolving Donkey,

24/07/2008 14:24:43
13.

It's not Mario, it's some other douchebag.
15

Peter - very disappointed/concerned,

Edinburgh 24/07/2008 15:03:19
What about installing CCTV cameras in order to catch any future 'phantom piddlers' and/or any other lurking ne'er-do-wells.

16

Think Tank,

24/07/2008 15:03:28
Get over yourself Buttress.

The St Andrew's Square CA plan of less grass, more paving (so that the grass wouldn't get trampled on and look tatty) tells you everything you need to know about the Cockburn Association.

Presumably they would have had "keep off the (small area of) grass" signs too.

Thankfully they were prevented any say in the development, and as a result we have a beautiful garden, interesting features (water, cafe) and hundreds of people enjoying sitting on the grass and having lunch.

A public square for the public.

The Cockburn Association would be shocked.

17

Buttress,

24/07/2008 15:13:07
The Cockburn was fully supportive of the public use.

What it said was what David Black also said in his recent Scotsman piece - a good idea, badly executed.

No expensive and pointless water 'feature', wider paving - doesn't equal get off the grass. Mya indeed have meant more grass. But it's tacky design. Could have been so much better.



18

Peter - very disappointed/concerned,

Edinburgh 24/07/2008 15:22:19
"The Scotsman steps were built around 1899 in a French style."

So the steps are really a 'pissoire'?

Perhaps, while they are here, we should get UNESCO's reps to check things out as they are well used to dealing with piddling matters.



19

Think Tank,

24/07/2008 15:40:33
Buttress, you should go out into St Andrew's Square on a warm sunny afternoon like today and spread your word for the Cockburn Association plan.

See how many people agree with them, and how many people actually USING the square quite like the grass, water and cafe.
20

Buttress,

24/07/2008 15:44:18
I see Peter has awoken, slightly.

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

I suspect that people would have liked it if it had been simpler too - and the cash saved spent on other projects.


Me, I think the cafe design wrong for the location, the materials used for paving etc not sensitive, and the pool unnecessary.

It could have been so much better.
21

Peter - very disappointed/concerned,

Edinburgh 24/07/2008 15:49:12
#21 Buttress

Hi Buttress, gosh, I almost forgot you existed.

22

Peter - very disappointed/concerned,

Edinburgh 24/07/2008 15:57:16
"The eyesore is potentially one of the first things tourists see – and smell, due to people urinating there – when they leave Waverley Station."

Then why don't they use the toilets in the station before leaving? Must be the high cost of the station loos which drives the tourists away.
23

Buttress,

24/07/2008 15:57:46
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
24

blackley,

Edinburgh 24/07/2008 16:29:11
Block it off would seem the best idea.
25

Brad,

Glasgow 24/07/2008 23:01:14
#25, nah, when you gotta go, you gotta go
26

,

25/07/2008 00:59:10
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
27

,

25/07/2008 01:03:48
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
28

Buttress,

25/07/2008 09:52:03
I think that possibly the wider social malaise is going to be hard to tackle, but cleaning, a gate, and regular monitoring etc will all help to make these stairs usable once again.

I think anytrhing done to make this historic city more attractive is worthwhile.
29

,

25/07/2008 10:58:25
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
30

Buttress,

25/07/2008 11:05:49
I think anything which enhances the city worth it, Peter. That's as opposed to spoiling it. But maybe any shooting to be done, you should be first against the wall?

However, advocating violence is an interesting new development in your regular rantings.

However - do read the latest in the Caltongate saga on:

http://www.independentrepublicofthecanongate.blogspot.com/





31

Peter - very disappointed/concerned,

Edinburgh 25/07/2008 11:31:02
#31

"any shooting to be done, you should be first against the wall?"

Ladies first Buttress, so after you.

As for 'rantings', mine pale into insignificance in comparison to yours.

I still think the cost of this 'tidyup' i.e. the steps, is too high.


32

Buttress,

25/07/2008 11:38:48
No, you can go first. Show how it's done. I will watch with interest, as I am sure will a number of others.

Sounds to me to be well worth it, as it's not simply a tidy-up I understand, but something longer term too.

Good that little by little, places are being repaired and decline halted.



33

Peter - very disappointed/concerned,

Edinburgh 25/07/2008 11:45:38
#33

Well, they better install CCTV or employ security guards as the steps will probably be just as bad 2 weeks after the job has been completed (whenever that might be).

34

Peter - very disappointed/concerned,

Edinburgh (near the Scotsman steps) 25/07/2008 12:00:29
#33

"I will watch with interest, as I am sure will a number of others."

Is this you giving your multiple personalities a treat again?


35

Buttress,

25/07/2008 12:24:58
No, I think the mental health problems are all yours!

I am sure that many Embra citizens will be pleased to consider that another small but interesting part of one of Europe's most beautiful cities is being improved.
36

Peter - very disappointed/concerned,

Edinburgh 25/07/2008 12:49:59
#36

"another small but interesting part of one of Europe's most beautiful cities is being improved."

Yes, one very small part at a very high price which will probably only remain 'improved' for a very short time.

Prediction: It will probaly be closed to the public use after 5:00 pm every evening. It will have to be or it will again receive the attention of vandals and ne'er-do-wells.

Too much is being spent on this 'rat-run'.

37

Buttress,

25/07/2008 12:58:40
I gather the intention is to gate it, as it says in the article.

How nice to think some want to enhance, not destroy as you are keen on!



38

Peter - very disappointed/concerned,

Edinburgh 25/07/2008 15:04:21
I don't recall making a case for destroying the 'Scotsman' steps at any point. I do favour cleaning and sanitising them before making some attempt to reopen them as a link between Market Street and the North Bridge.

Basically I am merely pointing out that I think (as I'm sure do many others) that this is yet another example of overspend and that the steps can only be opened during limited hours in a probably useless attempt to prevent them from rapidly being restored to their previous lavatorial status (unfortunately).

The article does not state who will provide funding, but we can all bet it will be the Council Tax payer, this in turn raises the question as to ownership.
39

Buttress,

25/07/2008 16:01:07
If you favour cleaning and opening, how are you suggesting it is done then? I am sure the council will be delighted if you pass on suggestions.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.