Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Wednesday, 7th January 2009 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

RBS chiefs come out fighting after attacks by shareholders



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 24 April 2008
UNDER-fire senior figures at Royal Bank of Scotland have come out fighting after facing up to angry shareholders in the Capital.
RBS chairman Sir Tom McKillop launched a passionate defence of his position after being accused of not having the qualifications to do the job.

And the bank also defended the salaries and bonuses being paid to its top executives despite the plumme
ting share price and its plea to shareholders for £12 billion of extra funds.

The Edinburgh-based bank's 18-man board faced more than 300 shareholders at its annual general meeting in the Edinburgh International Conference Centre yesterday.

After coming through a difficult afternoon, chief executive Sir Fred Goodwin received a boost today when former RBS chairman Sir George Mathewson said he should not be ousted from his role.

Sir George, who together with Sir Fred pulled off the RBS takeover of NatWest in 2000, said: "This is not the day for throwing out the baby with the bathwater." He said it would be "fanciful" to try to find a new chief executive while the bank has a lot of work to do to integrate Dutch bank ABN Amro.

His comments followed a fiery question and answer session yesterday as shareholders voiced their concerns over the current running of the company.

Musselburgh-based private shareholder Fred Lawson said Northern Rock had been brought down by a chairman and chief executive with "no qualifications or knowledge in banking". Addressing Sir Tom, he said: "I see that your background is as a pharmacist and I am sure that you are an excellent pharmacist but I find you a little like PC Plod rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic."

But Sir Tom said: "I don't want to be overly defensive but I am not a pharmacist. My background is in mathematics and science and I worked 40 years in industry.

"I've been involved as a CEO for various positions for 14 years and involved in many, many major transactions and I have been almost ten years on the boards of banks. So, with humility, I would suggest I do know a bit about it."

The announcement on Tuesday by RBS that it was to launch what is thought to be Britain's biggest ever rights issue was always expected to make yesterday's AGM a stormy affair.

Despite the concerns, Sir Fred, who received a £2.9 million bonus as part of his £4.2m salary last year, only spoke once during the meeting, which lasted well over two hours, and even then only when a shareholder insisted that he answer instead of Sir Tom.

Among the disgruntled private shareholders was John Stein, who said: "You guys are paid as though you are superhuman and it is very clear you are not."

Bob Scott, RBS's senior independent director with a responsibility for remuneration, replied:

"If we want to attract top-class executives then we have to be coming up with a remuneration system that is there or thereabouts against the comparative groups."

Following the meeting, the bank's share price continued its decline today, falling 9.5p in early morning trade to 335p.





The full article contains 530 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 24 April 2008 11:06 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Royal Bank of Scotland
 
1

Mikey,

24/04/2008 12:31:13
But they're NOT top class executives!!!! If they were, the RBS wouldn't be in this position!

Maybe Bob Scott needs to consider his postion as well as he obviously doesn't have a clue!
2

me150,

25/04/2008 11:11:54
The bank would be in this position regardless, we are in a 'Global Recession' not a local RBS one or Labour party caused one.

No-one in RBS got them into this, it was totally unavoidable.

Fair enough they are getting paid far too much but there is always the risk that an organisation will call on the shareholders to assist at times like this. Surely all you shareholders didn't think that it was all take and no give. If you did then you obviously cannot read the basic shareholder agreement.

After the Lloyds thing a number of years ago I would have thought that you would all have understood the risks.

If you can't afford it, don't buy it. Shares are very risky so if you can't take the pain don't look for any gain.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Should banks be paying for staff Christmas parties as their customers suffer?
Yes, staff deserve to be rewarded for their year’s hard work
It’s okay making a contribution, but not £1 million
No, staff should have to pay for their own parties

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.