Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Wednesday, 7th January 2009 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Children left in danger amid lack of safe homes



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
20 March 2007
WARRANTS to take children at risk out of their family homes are being regularly ignored in the Lothians because of a shortage of children's home beds.
Around half the "place of safety" warrants issued by the Children's Panel are understood to be useless because nowhere safe can be found for the child concerned.

The orders are usually made to take the children of alcoholic or drug-abusing parents into care.

But in some instances the child is being left in apparent danger.

Members of the Children's Panel told the Evening News that around four children every week were left in their homes against their orders.

One panel member said: "I have issued place of safety warrants for one child three or four times and nothing has happened.

"It's an emergency measure only used in the most serious circumstances. These children are in the most at risk and vulnerable situations and they are being left there. Their most basic physical and emotional needs are not being met. Lots of panel members have left because of this problem."

One former colleague, who recently resigned in frustration at the failings of the system, said: "There was one case that haunts me. A two-year-old child who was badly hurt at home after a safety warrant was not executed. Cases like that happen all the time.

"There are many cases when parents are incapable of looking after children because of alcohol and drug abuse, but they are not removed, although I've not heard of children not being removed when there's a risk of physical or sexual abuse."

The former panel member added: "The city council should be held accountable. They can be taken to court and made to take responsibility but they have not been, and that should happen."

The Children's Hearing panels act on the recommendations of social workers.

As well as fears for the children's safety, there are worries that some delinquent youngsters are being allowed to move on to more serious crime because they are being left with dysfunctional families. The children who pose the most serious threat to the public are sent to secure accommodation at Howdenhall.

But the most frequent problem is due to a shortage of places with foster families and at children's homes, or young people centres, for those children who need to be protected rather than locked up.

The chairwoman of the Children's Hearing Panel in Edinburgh Lynn Dunsmore declined to comment. However, John Stevenson, Unison branch chairman, who represents social workers, said more beds needed to be provided in residential units.

He said: "I am aware of situations where children have deemed to be at risk and have not been accommodated.

"From our point of view there is a need for more foster carers and more beds in residential units, so we can deal with problems earlier before they get more serious."

There are around 280 foster carers in Edinburgh and a total of 53 beds in young people centres and Councillor Andrew Burns, the city's children and families leader, said: "We make every effort to find children an appropriate place of safety when a place of safety warrant is issued.

"The child's extended family or friends of the family are normally investigated first before other options such as foster care and residential care placements are made. I am absolutely confident that all cases are regularly monitored and reviewed and every possible effort is made to ensure that a child is never left in a place where they could be harmed.

"Since Christmas we have taken on 14 new foster carers and I am keen to continue our campaign to increase this number."

The full article contains 618 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 20 March 2007 2:33 PM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Social Work
 
1

lisa,

perth 20/03/2007 13:02:23

Perhaps someone from the council could let us know how many councillors went on junkets such as conferences or fact finding missions, while these children were left to suffer through lack of funds.

I didn't even know the council needed foster carers in this area - that's a measure of how hard they didn't try to find suitable homes.

Not surprised that panel members are leaving. The claimed effectiveness of the children's hearing system is one of the great myths of a supposedly civilised Scotland. It just doesn't work.

2

alex paterson,

embra 20/03/2007 13:14:26

No Hospital beds,No Childrens Home beds,Forget Trident,Keep people alive,Give them beds.

3

adogcatcherwearsauniformto,

peoples republic of eastlovia 20/03/2007 14:17:13

1. Panel DOES NOT follow the recommendations of the Social worker. It looks at all the evidence and makes a decision on the best interests of the child, this can and does come from a variety of sources.

2. Do not blame the social woker blame the director, I once asked for him to appear; guess what warrent carried out!

3. How many Sherrifs warrents are ignored, exactly none. So why is the sherrif principal not ask why these warrents are not being implemented?

4. And finally remember this old excuse, I only wrote the report. The panel made the decision!

This is about money nothing more nothing less. Junkies and alkies not worth bothering about as there are no votes. Sex/physical abuse bad and must do something.

4

Xena - Warrior Princess,

20/03/2007 15:08:18

#3 If what you say is true then it is truly disgusting and how these council officials can sleep at night is beyond me. I quite believe you when you say there are no votes from junkies and alkies but to leave children in these homes is a bloody disgrace.

5

Repton,

edinburgh 20/03/2007 15:17:22

Appalling situation.These kids need protected from the likes of who brought the poor kids into this world.It`s not their fault and they need our protection.As for their parents best send them off in a leaky boat in the Forth with the council.

6

poohbear,

20/03/2007 16:44:28

I am a foster carer in edinburgh. I have taken on more than Im registered for in emergencys but because of a small house I cant do any more. I have tried for 5 years now to get a bigger house so I could help more children but still havent found one.
Mayby the housing office should be involved with current carers to move them to more suitable housing.

7

MoragtheToerag,

Embra 20/03/2007 16:56:15

Again, high housing costs are a source of social ill.

When will be people SEE the connection between a city overrun with pokey, 2bed FLATS out of the reach of most working people in Edinburgh's income and so many of the city's problems.

Who can foster when their family is already in crowded conditions, as many in Edinburgh are?

8

Evie,

20/03/2007 20:41:49

Couldn't agree more Morag#7.
I'm sick of hinting that said pokey 2 room flats particularly in the Granton Waterfront area will lead to an even larger extent of social exclusion and depravation that it did in the 70's and 80's.

For goodness sake build homes for families not for families of mice.

9

Jez,

180 20/03/2007 22:34:07

Suggestions

1. Council pay £100k for worst example of self indulgent art of all time outside Council Headquarters. Solution stop wasting taxpayers money on self indulgent rubbish and spend more money on front line services

2.Children Panel Members, stop whinging and get on with your job. Its not so long ago that you lot failed to place in a secure unit a couple of yobs caught by the Evening News in glorious technicolour joyriding stolen cars.

3. #3 You make yourself sound really important and a complete whinger. Do you know that I coinvented the Apostrophe! However, you do make a valid point - Sherrifs warrants don't get ignored. Perhaps because Sheriffs have more authority than a bunch of middle class whingers whose own ego trips leads them to become Childrens Panel members

4. Word of the day - Whinger

10

john jones,

Scotland 20/03/2007 22:53:41

#9 - You sound an angry man

#3 - #9 does have a point about your view of your own importance

One former colleague, who recently resigned in frustration at the failings of the system, said: "There was one case that haunts me. A two-year-old child who was badly hurt at home after a safety warrant was not executed. Cases like that happen all the time.

A little bit of proper investigation gets the real and shocking story a big bit of laziness writes divel like the above!

Thank goodness I am not daft enough to buy a copy of your mince paper

11

syntax,

Edinburgh 21/03/2007 02:44:13

Ah yet again poor council and social workers..... Damned if they remove a child from a dangerous environment and damned if they don't remove a child from a dangerous environment.... personally I'd leave them all at home.

They are more at risk within the 'care' system than they ever would be outside it ! Get a grip ! Kids are on secure orders and running around the streets. Nobody (not joe public) or the authorities give a damn - why should they ? Don't you know that kids have rights !!

Shut all the children's homes and send the residents home. In general they will be no worse off and we will all get a council rebate !

12

adogcatcherwearsauniformto,

peoples republic of eastlovia 21/03/2007 20:35:31

1. All panel members want the system to work, however if you don't get the resources it never will.
As for my self-importance; until the Director was asked to explain exactly why his staff wouldn't carry out the decision nothing was happening. Surely the question should be why did it have to take his attendance to get the services? It seems the buck stops somewhere else.

2. I am unsure why you think that panel members are all middle class? Maybe you need to look hard at your preconceptions and attitudes! After all why let facts stand in the way, panels MUST be representative of the local demographics.

3. Whilst you may well have co-invented the apostrophe, unfortunately you failed to copyright it.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.